Talk:Salonbiz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
From VfD:
At first I thought this was advertising for this product, but now it seems to be an attack on it. RickK 23:07, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I think it is written fairly NPOV, but it could be better. Some claims are still unqualified. But it presents both positive and negative aspects, and establishes some level of notability. — David Remahl 23:25, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Although the article certainly requires some work, it's not overwhelmingly negative or positive, and certainly contains some level of notability economically. -TheFed 24:07, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, but not because of POV. This is the #1 software for a very, very specialized business. I'm not very strongly wishing it deleted, but I think it's too narrow a subject, too specialized, and too mutable. I.e. fails to be notable. Geogre 02:17, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Even if this is slightly notable now, what about five years from now? Or ten? Isomorphic 21:29, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Comment. Odd. That's the same rhetorical question some ask to show that an article should be kept, implying that we should keep anything because anything might be famous five or ten years from now. ;-)
- User:Jallan forgot to sign his comment. David Remahl 23:30, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Comment. Odd. That's the same rhetorical question some ask to show that an article should be kept, implying that we should keep anything because anything might be famous five or ten years from now. ;-)
- Cleanup, not VFD. Keep. anthony (see warning) 14:44, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion
