Talk:Schema
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
From the main page:
- this is a stub article - the idea of a schema needs a broader treatment than just being called a subset of an ontology
Yes. I agree, if only because I don't understand what that means. But I don't think this note should be on the page itself. --KQ 21:13 Aug 21, 2002 (PDT)
Contents |
[edit] Genetic algorightms similarity schema
Is it a set of entities or the template that represents that set? -Pgan002 00:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Database schema
Why are "software architecture" and "Active directory" mentioned in the disambiguation page?! This clearly violates the WP Syle Guide of disambiguation pages. I also think that "conceptual graph", "semantic network", "semantic web" and "data model" sould not be mentioned. Disambiguation pages should only have a brief definition of each use and refer the reader to a specific page. If there is no page about a specific use of a term, I think that either one should be created or the entry deleted. -Pgan002 00:43, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Prior knowledge
Surely "schema" never means "prior knowledge"! -Pgan002 00:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Specialized ontology
Is it the set of questions or the actual ontology, i.e. the entities?
