User talk:SethTisue
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] FMP
Hello! Check out this link and find the answer: http://www.fmp-label.de/news/index_en.html Mear
[edit] Fernando Grillo
Thanks for the note - I realised this morning that I should just have dumped the actual links rather than Grillo himself. Thanks for doing it for me (and also - since I assume you are the same person - for the superb Jandek site) StuartDouglas 13:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: James Nicol
If James Nicol refuses to stop interfering with the editing of Guy Davenport, I can initiate a Request for Comment on the article; but I can't initiate an RfC on him as a WP user unless a second editor contacts him on his Talk page. Deor 03:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm a bit frustrated as well, but I'm still hoping that with some time and patience the problems with the Davenport article will lessen and compromises can be arrived at. It's threatening to turn into an edit war, but hopefully it's not quite there yet?--SethTisue 07:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- OK, now James' last edit has me really upset. I'm ready to join in any official action we can take against him.-SethTisue 15:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Seth, did you read my comment in the discussion section on Guy Davenport? In what way are my edits "interfering" while Deor's meddling is simply "editing"? Why are you getting emotional about this? I'm happy to discuss it w/ you, Deor, & any others. James Nicol 16:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your last message, Seth. Please read my last entry into the discussion. I address the other changes, piece by piece. Although I stick to my guns as much as anyone, look at how many times the article has changed w/out any reversions by yours truly. The comma that offended three people (hardly everyone) is gone. You can hardly call me unwilling to discuss. You & Deor have both been guilty of the reversion. Also, I still await to see whether Deor cares at all about Davenport or merely about all Wikipieces following in his version of lockstep. Remember: What's most important about this article is that it be beautiful, interesting, informative, and in the spirit of Davenport; not that it simply follow some arbitrary rules. James Nicol 17:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, I've just joined in here out of interest in particular on the Davenport page, and lord what a mess it is turning into! James Nicol is acting like a four-year-old. I don't see why he doesn't accept the Wikipedia process for what it is, and start his own page on Davenport if he doesn't like what the group effort amounts to. CXII 18:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate it.--SethTisue 18:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
