User talk:Spyder Monkey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hay, if you leave me a message here i'm gonna respond here instead of your talkpage from now on so the conversation is all together and stuff kthx. --Spyder_Monkey (Talk)

1 Welcome
2 Fair use image in userpage
3 WikiProject Tennis
4 Davis Cup/Tennis Match templates
5 Davis Cup
6 Le Mans races
7 Tennis edits
8 Tennis Games
9 Tennis
10 Re: Norway Davis Cup team

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Spyder Monkey, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Stifle (talk) 22:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use image in userpage

The fair use image Image:Huntsville channel cats.gif is on your user page, which is a contravention of our policy on fair use images. Please remove it. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 22:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Review of California Crazy by Spyder Monkey Genre: Alternative Rock 3.7

nice voice babe the production on the song is good. i like the guitar lick at the begining of the track. it is very cool. the mix is good. this is one of those songs that, no matter what, or how it is mixed or recorded would be good. you can tell a truly great track from slop thrown together if it captures your attention, not just how well it was recorded. this song has both, it is recorded really well, and it has a great feel about i think i will listen again. very nicely done here. rock on Extra Credit: Female Vocals, Guitars, Production, Mood, Originality.

Bloomington, Indiana August 5th, 2005

wha? Chris 22:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Tennis

Welcome To WikiProject Tennis

Hi and welcome to WikiProject Tennis. As you might have known, WikiProject Tennis is a project dedicated into improving tennis-related articles.

These are a few things you might find useful, when working with us:

Feel free to create some templates regarding our WikiProject.

Vote for the article you think needs improvement, in our Collaboration Department.

Join in assessing tennis articles with the Assessment Department

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or one of our other members. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! K.Z ^Talk ^• ^Vandal ^• ^Contrib 06:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Davis Cup/Tennis Match templates

Now it works. I think that Template:TennisMatch need some changes. (Sorry I don't speak english very well.) Kedarus 09:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

You don't use Template:DavisCupbox? How do you plan in future, in new pages? I would like to help you with creating new pages. Kedarus 10:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

There are some problems, write me if you have some tips for solution:

If not fill results one player of match is highlight as winner.
When match not end normal (w/o, not played, not completed). --Kedarus 09:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Davis Cup

What is better? What do you plan for split pages.

xxx Davis Cup - yyy Zone or xxx Davis Cup yyy ZoneKedarus 07:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean about this. On pages 2007 Davis Cup and 2007 Davis Cup - World Group are same part Draw. Kedarus 07:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

What do you think about rewrite Template:TennisMatch for Template:DavisCupbox ? Kedarus 06:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

See on Template:DavisCupbox, there are write new arguments for using this template if match not ending normal. I thing now it is used for 100% matches. Kedarus 07:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Le Mans races

First off I'd like to say I appreciate your work in attempting to cut up Le Mans 24h Races into the individual articles. Just a request though, if possible, if you could possibly clean up some of the ones that you paste since they contain errors or are simply written poorly. I certainly will assist in this, but the more help the better. Thanks. The359 03:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tennis edits

Hello there. A slightly more detailed edit summary would have been helpful so that I could see exactly why you were deleting so much material. In any event, restoring some of the detail you deleted is not the only thing I did. I made some substantive changes to increase accuracy and eliminate ambiguity.

I am not in favor of deleting the great players sections, although I would be open to revising the sections so that the people and teams listed must satisfy explicit, objective criteria, like total number of Grand Slam titles won during their careers. (Some of the people listed already have statistical information beside their names.) Many established tennis editors have contributed to these lists, and I believe there needs to be a list of great or best or significant (or whatever you want to call it) tennis players to provide historical context for this sport. Best regards. Tennis expert 06:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello, "In Australian doubles, both players on the same team line up on the same side of the court, with one player at the net and one in the backcourt." - A lot of excess verbiage. The serving team plays Aussie doubles, but you allow that the recieving team might. Why mention that one player is at the baseline? That states the obvious. Where else is the server going to be? "The one in back will generally move to the vacant side of the court after the point begins, which forces the opposing player to hit the ball down the line." No, but the receiver does hit down the line. "This formation also allows the player at the net to poach more easily." Right. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ken2849 (talk • contribs).

First, let me thank you for coming to my talk page to berate me, and then not signing your comment. Second, I only moved that from the main tennis article; I didn't write it in the first place. I see you've fixed it up (along with lots of other individual edits), so I guess there's really nothing to discuss. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 00:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tennis Games

I saw that you posted a link on the tennis games page I created. If you have any other suggestions or would like to add any games it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

[edit] Tennis

I have no interest in making the Tennis article a "featured article" if making the article worse is the price to be paid for that status. I regret that you are frustrated with my disagreement with some of your edits. But if I believe you are making the article worse, then you should naturally expect me to continue disagreeing. This is not personal, as I have no beef with you personally and have no agenda about disagreeing with your edits just for the sake of disagreeing. Best regards. Tennis expert 03:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I understand that we disagree, but I'd like to know exactly how. What, specifically, did you not like about my last edit? How did my edits "make the article worse"? What else in the article do you feel needs to stay the same? Is there anything in the article that you feel could be changed, or do you feel like it's perfect the way it is? What do you not like about the FA standards? These are honest questions; I want to get a sense of your feelings about the article so we can move forward constructively. --Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 03:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Norway Davis Cup team

Thanks! They might be a poor team but at least the article on them is up to scratch. It's amazing what you can do with that ITF database :p Sam Vimes | Address me 23:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/p/y/User_talk%7ESpyder_Monkey_a043.html"