Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/DiamondVoice
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
[edit] User:DiamondVoice
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
DiamondVoice (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log • rfcu) (indef blocked)
- Suspected sockpuppets
TabloidPsyco (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) (indef blocked)
BLUNDERWOMAN (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) (indef blocked)
REMOVALS (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log)
- Report submission by
RJASE1 Talk 02:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Evidence
DiamondVoice (talk • contribs) was blocked for 24 hours for making legal threats regarding an AfD. Shortly thereafter, TabloidPsyco (talk • contribs) appeared to make comments supportive of the retaining the article in the AfD. BLUNDERWOMAN (talk • contribs) also appeared as an obvious vandal, blanking the AfD page and comments critical of DiamondVoice.
- Comments
- A checkuser showed that DiamondVoice and TabloidPsyco do not, at least, share the same IP.
- BLUNDERWOMAN blanked a report about DiamondVoice's behavior from WP:ANI--[1]. --Akhilleus (talk) 02:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Adding REMOVALS (talk • contribs) - Re-adding the same information to the Sinitta article diff as DiamondVoice, diff regarding a business venture with Carl M. Cox, the subject of the article deleted in the above AfD. RJASE1 Talk 17:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Conclusions
DiamondVoice, TabloidPsyco, and BLUNDERWOMAN all indef blocked; REMOVALS inconclusive per this conversation. --Akhilleus (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
