Tafseer-e-Kabeer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tafseer e Kabeer (The major Commentary) is a ground breaking work on exegesis of Quran undertaken in modern times. It was compiled over 20 years containing lectures, writings and notes on Quranic verses by Mirza Basheerud Deen Mahmood.
Contents |
[edit] Background
The first of the eleven volumes was published in 1940 by Zia ul Islam Press, Qadian. Mirza Basheerud Deen Mahmood Ahmad was the second Head of the Ahmadiyya muslim community, which is one of the modern islamic reform movements. The author considered this commentary to be the next step ahead in Quranic studies. In the preface to the first volume, he writes that classical commentators like Ibne Kathir, Zamakhshari and Abu Hayyan did a great service for the Quran, but they made a few fundamental mistakes: Namely, they included unreliable narrations from unsound sources in their comments and they relied too much on Jewish literature. The author also believed that the idea of Abrogation has been of great detriment to the authenticity of Divine nature of Quran. He also suggests throughout the commentary the vital importance of the order in which chapters were arranged in the present form. The writer has given much importance to this aspect in his commentary, which was a novel approach at the time of its publication.
[edit] Contents of the Commentary
Although the work is very detailed, it does not contain all chapters of the Quran.
- Volume 1: Surah 1 and portion of Surah 2.
- Volume 2: Surah 2 (remaining portion)
- Volume 3: Surahs 10-14
- Volume 4: Surahs 15-18
- Volume 5: Surahs 19-18
- Volume 6: Surahs 22-25
- Volume 7: Surahs 26-29
- Volume 8: Surahs 78-90
- Volume 9: Surahs 91-104
- Volume 10: Surahs 92-114
[edit] Features and Themes
The commentary is written in the style of an argument for Islam. Repeated references and comments are made on the works of famous orientalists like Theodor Nöldeke, William Muir and William Montgomery Watt. The author has frequently dismissed the views of these writers in favour of more linguistic approach towards understanding the meanings of Quran. As compared to other classical texts, this commentary seems to rely less on "Asbab e Nuzool" or reasons of revelation of verses. This approach greatly reduces the impact and validity of negative remarks and allegations made on the Quran by non-muslim theologians.
Each verse is explained separately in two sections. The fist section gives different translations of the words in the verse according to major classical Arabic lexicons along with their different uses derived from classical arabic prose and poetry. The second section contains detailed commentary.
A detailed bibliography of references and index are provided at the end of each volume.
