Talk:Truck camper
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article needs to be worked on so it doesn't read like an advert. -Will Pittenger 04:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- I would say this problem is partially solved. However, I think more of the first section needs to be moved below the TOC. That would help with readability. Will (Talk - contribs) 02:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Wikify tag added. This article definitely needs some cleanup.. statements like "probably the most versatile..." and "The differences between a 1/2 ton and 3/4 ton are not so apparent" Needs wikified as well.PWdiamond 07:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PWdiamond (talk • contribs) 07:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move completed. —Doug Bell talk 21:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
Truck Campers → Truck camper — formatting page name per WP:NAME: Lowercase second and subsequent words in titles and Prefer singular nouns —Swpb talk contribs 18:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
—Swpb talk contribs 18:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I was not logged in, so it does not indicate myself (the author), but I have edited the page according to the latest recommendations. Feel free to continue critiquing Beddows1 08:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- -PWdiamond 08:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)- It read better for sure, but I think moving the linking sections such as clubs and other references towards the bottom or perhaps merging them into external links might make the article look better... They also break up the flow of the article, as they seem to be peppered throughout it. Just my two cents :) PWdiamond 08:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
