Talk:Unterseeboot 691

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Germany Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Related task forces (general topics):
	Maritime warfare task force
Related task forces (nations and regions):
	German military history task force
Related task forces (periods and conflicts):
	World War II task force

Wouldn't U-691 be a better title of this page? "Unterseeboot" is German, not English and is not used very often in English at all (and we do have a pesky naming convention on the use of English words). Simply saying "U-Number" is the most common usage and I don't see any ambiguity in using that format. I just hit preview, and of course the far more common U format isn't even a redirect here. Remember, one of the central ideas of our naming conventions is to preserve easy linking so long as ambiguity issues are not a problem. I just did a quick check, and most of the links to the U-boat articles are obscured like so [[Unterseeboot 691|U-691]]. Why not just have the article live at U-691? --maveric149

In a word, ambiguity issues. Is U-238 an isotope or a submarine? Is U-2 a boat, a band, or a submarine? Furthermore, the Wikipedia naming standard calls for spelling out acronyms unless the original meaning has been largely forgotten (eg, laser). The ship naming standard calls for spelling out "Unterseeboot." And finally, I've been creating Unterseeboot articles for a long time now and don't feel like changing. ;-> --the Epopt

I don't say this often, but you convinced me right away. :) However, redirects for the less ambiguous ones would be nice. --maveric149

June 23, 2002, Events: maveric149 convinced right away ;->

You, in turn, have convinced me to create a mess o' redirects.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../u/n/t/Talk%7EUnterseeboot_691_d687.html"