Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Belbase
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Re: Belbase
Substub about a nonnotable surname. RickK 00:05, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Concur- delete. This does point up, though, that we ought to have something on Arghakhachi and other divisions of Nepal.... -FZ 00:09, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and improve - This was VfD'd 2 minutes after creation [1] .... How do you know the submitter was even done editing? -- Netoholic @ 00:14, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Tell, me Netoholic, what IS a good time to wait for an article to be listed on VfD? Five years? Ten? RickK 00:14, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Watching Special:Newpages for VfD candidates is not appropriate - invariably the articles will be bad first versions, and you're cutting apart new editors and probably discouraging them. Try Special:Randompage instead. -- Netoholic @ 07:13, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a candidate for a speedy for being an article with no content that goes to an external link. It is also like the "Bather" article in that it's a family vanity. Finally, "Trolling" is a personal attack, Netoholic. I'm sure you meant "trawling," but your choice of word could have been construed as an accusation that RickK is a disruptive and undesirable user, which is wholly inappropriate language. Geogre 04:21, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Surname dictdef. — Gwalla | Talk 04:22, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- It's been there a day, and is still a one line article going to an external link. Delete unless expanded by the end of the VfD period - a few days is more than enough time to write a decent stub. Average Earthman 09:16, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - surname is not encyclopedic - Tεxτurε 17:06, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. If there's an encyclopedia article here, someone can write it some day. Jallan 19:30, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
