Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Daniel Müller-Schott
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was invalid vote. Needs to be on the copyvio page. I will move it there. Woohookitty 06:15, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Daniel Müller-Schott
- The article appears to just be a nearly identical copy of the Vitae from the Daniel's site: [1] --Mysidia 20:03, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and tag with copyvio. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 20:03, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
- Copyvio. Dcarrano 05:05, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Although it may be a copyright violation, I don't think that is really the issue, even if hypothetically, the author placed it under a license acceptable to Wikipedia, the source is a Vitae designed to promote the person, as such it seems to be irremediable POV. --05:13, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio. JamesBurns 07:47, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
