Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Fundamentalism vs. Realism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Fundamentalism vs. Realism
Er... well, this is an article comparing two existing concepts, is original research, deals with the topic only as it applies to a specific group. And I think it's POV. I'd love to be more confident about that, but the wording is only borderline POV, though it seems to be based on certain unprovable assumptions. Basically, I don't think it can be cleaned up, so it should be deleted. - KeithTyler 23:52, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Original research, misleading title, appeal to only a very small party, another example of people mistaking their private concerns for encyclopedic content. Geogre 00:14, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Some content might be salvaged into German Green Party and/or worldwide green parties]; if not, delete. -Sean Curtin 00:32, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
- Neutral, I do not have an opinion whether it should be deleted but I know that this is a well known and documented battle, as I read in Dutch newspapers, between factions in the German Green party. So I am quite sure it is not original research. Andries 00:36, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- The article's title is misleading... nothing to indicate that this is about Green Party politics. Possibly merge relevant content into approriate Green Party article(s), but as it stands, this article should be deleted. Kevyn 00:43, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- This is useless POV stuff as it stands, but weirdly, our only discussion of the fundi vs. realo split, which uses German terminology, for crying out loud, is in the article on the Canadian Green party. We have a stub on fundi, not even that on realo. There is content we need on this topic, but this generalizing isn't it. -- Jmabel 03:12, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Original research. --Yath 04:39, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. There is a lot of well-written and encyclopedic content here that should be saved. Agree that the title is wrong, and there's a lot of work still required, but I think this can and will be salvaged if given the chance. Andrewa 18:04, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Davodd 12:36, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing here but generalities, that mostly apply just as much to socialist parties, ultra-right groups, purist and revisionist Tolkien fans in respect to the films, anti-abortionist groups, pro-abortionist groups, and so forth. Just wool-gathering. Jallan 16:34, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Agree w/ Jallan. Delete. Lacrimosus 21:50, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree with Jallan as well. Let it go with no regrets. ClockworkTroll 06:21, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
