Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Levy Quinn et al

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To add to this deletion debate, click here

Non-famous 9/11 victims. Move to Sep 11 wiki and delete. --Jiang 08:05, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)

• Delete - the attack was famous, these people are just dead. -- Cyrius | Talk 15:32, Mar 27, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. They are verifiable, they were involved in a historical event, and they add social context to one's understanding of the attacks. Everyking 16:35, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • We can verify people at numerous historical events, but that doesn't mean every one of them deserves an article. -- Cyrius | Talk 17:23, Mar 27, 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete, after copying anything relevant to Sep 11 wiki as normal. I thought this discussion was settled long ago. Andrewa 20:32, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)
      • Settled? More like ossified. Anyways, transwiki and delete. -Sean 22:52, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)
        • Move to the wikimemorial and delete. This argument appears to have turned into two people with one view who won't concede that they are in the minority, and everyone else with the over.Average Earthman 12:13, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
          • It's much more than two people who believe this, most of the others just don't regularly participate on VfD. As for us being a minority, that is most irrelevant. There needs to be a consensus for deletion. There clearly is not. The fact that someone happened to die on 9/11 is not grounds for deletion. anthony (this comment is a work in progress and may change without prior notice) 15:07, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
            • Perhaps we should continue at the existing Village Pump discussion and eventually archive the results somewhere readily available? Andrewa 01:42, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
              • All I see on the pump is a question which is answered incorrectly by an anonymous user. anthony (this comment is a work in progress and may change without prior notice) 01:51, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
                • (9 stars deep, I think that's a PB for VfD) Ya gotta start somewhere, thanks for your contributions since, especially the link. Andrewa 08:52, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
            • The fact that someone happened to die on 9/11 isn't grounds for inclusion, either. Bearcat 04:04, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. What everyking said. anthony (this comment is a work in progress and may change without prior notice)
• Move to wikimemorial and delete, as is policy for all such entries. Bearcat 03:09, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Wikimemorial and delete Rossami 17:08, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. 9/11 and 11M victims are encyclopedic.Vfd 19:40, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • note that this is a sock puppet. --Jiang 23:04, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
    • Of whom? What evidence do you have? anthony (this comment is a work in progress and may change without prior notice) 23:16, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
      • Of Administrator and 666, according to VfD's own user page. I do note that the reference to 666 was added by 666, not by VfD, but there's been no objection. Andrewa 08:59, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Move to the sep11 wiki first. Maximus Rex 23:06, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Move to 9/11 wiki and delete. Wile E. Heresiarch 18:44, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Wikimemorial and delete. Why do we have to go through this same lengthy procedure every time a new 9/11 name comes forward. This shouldn't even be policy by now - it's almost tradition. Denni 00:58, 2004 Mar 30 (UTC)
  • Comment: I will of course be archiving this discussion at Wikipedia:9/11 victims, which is a response to this and several other requests for a policy. Andrewa 19:43, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Move to 9/11 Wiki and delete. Put relevant material where people are more likely to be looking for it. --Skyfaller 04:24, 2004 Apr 2 (UTC)
  • Comment: By material, do you mean this discussion, or the contents of the deleted articles? Anyway, I hope both will happen. Andrewa 14:43, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)

• Already transwiki'd to Sep11: [1], [2], [3], and [4]. Angela. 18:48, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC)
  • Looks like a copy/paste move to me. anthony (see warning) 17:06, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Until the special:import is working properly, it might well look like that. However, this is fixable later, and no reason not to delete these now. Angela. 17:13, Apr 4, 2004 (UTC)