Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Love fact
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page doesn't appear to make any sense. I can almost grasp what the author is getting at, but it really isn't Wikipedia-worthy in its present state. It might be folded into another article, but I don't think it would ever be a standalone article. jdb 22:03, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- This guy clearly doesn't speak English as his first language - perhaps this is a poor translation of a native proverb. Delete and tell the user to try better next time. Ed g2s 23:15, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- nonsense, delete. --Jiang 00:01, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Like this, it has to be nonsense, but if the author was trying to talk about emotional education, sensitivity training, and a philosophy of caring and therefore establishing that, in this scheme, there are 'love facts' to correspond to the 'facts' of regular discourse, then he needs to be explicit (and write with a different title or just outline the whole philosophy in a single article). Geogre 03:10, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. This is like a conversation with a guy who's just had a fight with his girlfriend and had a few to celebrate it. Fire Star 14:32, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC). This is the second time I've posted this vote, but the first one seems to have disappeared. If for some unforseen reason my original vote shows up again, please only count me for one deletion vote. Remarkable. Fire Star 03:47, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
