Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Sargon's Planet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Sargon's Planet
Fancruft with no potential to become encyclopedic ➥the Epopt 01:33, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Merge it into a Worlds of Star Trek type article. Otherwise: delete. Rje 02:05, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. What little information there is here is already covered in the Vulcan (Star Trek) article. Shimeru 02:37, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Concur. Edeans 04:56, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete.Mikkalai 04:14, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: DCEdwards1966 06:31, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Redirect to Vulcan (Star Trek). Gamaliel 07:03, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep,Trekkies could probably write a few volumes about it. Everyking 21:59, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)- I was a Trekkie once upon a time. I've never heard of it, and my guess is that the current stub contains all or nearly all the information on the subject in the official Trek canon. Of course, fan fiction is also real and verifiable, so perhaps some kind fan will write us something so we can fill out the stub. Isomorphic 09:54, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- OK. Merge/redirect. Everyking 14:20, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I was a Trekkie once upon a time. I've never heard of it, and my guess is that the current stub contains all or nearly all the information on the subject in the official Trek canon. Of course, fan fiction is also real and verifiable, so perhaps some kind fan will write us something so we can fill out the stub. Isomorphic 09:54, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete this trekcruft. Wyss 22:24, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. What Shimeru said. I'm sure Trekkies could write volumes on it. They can do a lot of things. Until they do, phasers to maximum setting. JRM 00:35, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)
- Keep - Star Trek info is already on this site. -- Judson 22:15, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, all it needs is information on the episode it was mentioned. -- Crevaner 00:06, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Crevaner's point is valid, with time the article will grow. -- Old Right 00:32, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Of course, but I don't think Crevaner should get two votes.. Everyking 00:52, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- User:Crevaner is a troll and User:Old Right is his sock puppet. Or vice versa. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:45, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. This is subtrivial fancruft with no relevance outside of the Star Trek universe. If one is a Star Trek fan who has heard of this planet (ie, would be searching for information on it in an encyclopedia), one already knows all that the article contains. If one is not a Star Trek fan, then that person has probably never heard of it and will never search for it. This makes for a useless article. Any important information about the planet as it relates to the Vulcan species can easily be merged into more useful articles. Indrian 23:36, Dec 30, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. To all those who want to document Star Trek trivia: there is a wiki for this, and it is not Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia. Isomorphic 09:48, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: starcruft. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:45, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep; being fancruft isn't a valid reason for deletion. Dan100 10:39, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
-
- No potential to become encyclopedic is, though. ➥the Epopt 01:31, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
