Talk:Wildfire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Fire Service, which collaborates on fire service-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. |
|
Suggested article edit guidelines:
|
|
|
This article has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it needs. |
|
 |
This article related to meteorology and/or specific weather events is part of WikiProject Meteorology and Weather Events, an attempt to standardize and improve all articles related to weather or meteorology. You can help! Visit the project page or discuss an article at its talk page. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance within WikiProject Meteorology. |
 |
To-do list for Wildfire: | edit · history · watch · refresh | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
Contents |
[edit] Top
I wish someone could restore the other picture to the article. Certainly we could have more than one picture. Rmhermen 14:23, Oct 31, 2003 (UTC)
I have a problem with the caption -- there's no way that this picture was taken from the International Space Station. I know omg, i need this website of wildfires for a project and i need pictures, not fake one.....kkoooll
Fire in San Bernadino Mountains
66.153.56.194 02:05, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)
It says that's where it was taken from here: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/natural_hazards_v2.php3?img_id=11805 - Evil saltine 06:42, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- I e-mailed the NASA contact on that web page and a human confirmed it was taken from the ISS. Tempshill 15:55, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Shouldn't the listing of famous wildfires be moved to the List of historic fires?Rsduhamel 07:28, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Nice PD photo of an Italian helicopter filling up its water bag from a pool here.
[edit] Too Many Images
In my totally unconsidered opinion, there are a few too many images at the top of this page, resulting in the text being seriously warped. Can't we spread them out a bit? --Orborde 02:55, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- Well, there are quite a few large images and not that much text. However, I do agree with your diagnosis, so if you can find a better arrangement, go ahead. Change image sizes as well if need be. Rl 07:50, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- I spent a little bit of time cleaning up the article and shrinking images. It should not appear to be as crowded as it was before.
Camper
[edit] ha to km² to acres
Please be careful with units in the text. For instance, in Portugal, all of them were wrong. I just updated it. Hope everything's OK now. Sorry for my bad english...
[edit] Problems with Info
In the first paragraph, you say that large forest fires are caused by "drought and prevention of small fires". How is that possible? Shouldn't you stop the small fires from getting big?
- The idea is that if small forest fires occur regularly, then they clean out all the fuel. If you put them out for years on end, all fuel accumulates for 20 years or more. Then when you do have a fire, it gets really huge really fast. -Lommer | talk 18:14, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
-
- The article needs a much better explanation, something like http://www.alternet.org/story/17066/ or a link to that. --Espoo 06:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Minor rewording
"The risk of major wildfires can be reduced partly by a reduction of the amount of fuel present."
The bolded word read as achieved beforehand.. was that intentional or a minor mistake? Doesn't logically follow that one would want to achieve the risk of a major wildfire, much less so by reducing fuel. 124.178.193.129 16:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge from Taiga#fire suppression
The info at Taiga#fire suppression is rather redundant, off-topic as stated, and more fitting here. It should be merged to Wildfire#fire suppression. -- P199 18:20, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Some at least of it refers to the particular fire cycles fround in taiga, and should be retained there, but other parts would be better moved here - MPF 20:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed, it should be merged. Prospect77 23:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Agree, should be merged. --Romanski 10:23, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- The fire suppression section here is pretty long already. Could it be a separate article, with the appropriate parts from the taiga article, and maybe some more specifics about suppression in other biomes?Lisamh 16:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Merge. It stands to reason that the fire suppression section of the wildfire article is going to be pretty long; that's really the biggest thing worth talking about in terms of wildfires. It definitely strays way off topic in the taiga article. Kafziel Talk 21:21, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Merge. Discussion of fire suppression is almost half of the taiga overview article, which is disproportionate - the content is more specific and specialised, so fits better in Wildfire. Martin 11:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
I've moved the detailed discussion on Fire Suppression from Taiga overview to "Success of fire suppression in northern forests" cross-referenced here. Content is on a slightly different theme to this article. Should they still be merged? Martin 12:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Total Land Area, Underground Fire, Conversion
Is it possible to put the percentage number of burning forest area compared to total LAND area of the country? In archipelago like Indonesia and Philippines, most of the country are sea/water, not land. There is a continous underground fire / smouldering fire (since 1997) on peat that burn without any oxygen supply deep under Kalimantan and East Sumatra forest. This fire will re-surface every dry season. Is this a new kind of forest fire?
There is something funny about France data: 300 km², 12,140 acres, I use online calculator: 300 square kilometer = 74131 acres. 12 140 acre = 49 square kilometer Which one is the correct number?
Perhaps the data should be 52140 acres === 211 square km. 0.04% of France is approx. 219 square km. Is this the correct data?
In some countries, Acres is not popular/unrecognized. Is it better to use square mile? (1 square mile=2.59 square km).
[edit] Cant understand sentence
Under "BEHAVIOR", the first sentence as printed makes no sense: When the water reserves in the soil, the soil are between 100 percent and 30percent. (Halesw 02:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC))
- Neither can I - if someone knows what is trying to be said (and has a citation for any statistics introduced) feel free to add it back. Richard001 08:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wildfire simulation and modeling
Any interest, would it be better as a section here or in a separate page? A little math and lots of journal references. Jmath666 23:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
