User:Wslack/Desk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For AMA business
[edit] Links
- Wikipedia:Resolving Disputes
- Foundation issues on Meta
- Wikipedia:Copyrights
- Wikipedia:General disclaimer
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Etiquette
- Wikipedia:Assume Good Faith
- Wikipedia:No Personal Attacks
- WP:LAWYER
[edit] AMA business
Hi all, I'm --\/\/slack (talk) with the AMA. I've been looking over this page and its related ones. Here are some observations:
- Realsched.exe violates NPOV, and contains almost no useful content. As a part of RealPlayer, issues with it should be in the criticism section, with link for both sides of the pro-con argument.
- There is no reason to call RealPlayer a good audio/video player without a citation. There is also no reason to call it a bad audio/video player without a citation.
- A reviews section would be helpful with leading reviews from various sources. The "Worst 25" listing would go here.
- RealAlternative would go under the Criticisms section (which differs from reviews in that it focuses on negative aspects found, as opposed to features, which does positive aspects)
- Users must keep their personal feelings out of this article. Everything said should be referenced , especially considering what has been said.
[edit] Comments
- A reviews section would be helpful with leading reviews from various sources. The "Worst 25" listing would go here.
- RealAlternative would go under the Criticisms section (which differs from reviews in that it focuses on negative aspects found, as opposed to features, which does positive aspects)
- You mean, it should be three sections: Criticism, Reviews, and Features? Or only Criticisms (negative aspects) and Reviews (positive aspects)? --Urod 15:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
