Talk:Yves Guérin-Sérac
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Hoax
Ganser and all other publication are of dubious quality. My Italian is not that good, but I suggest that if anyone is interested in this article one could use an official senate report: [1]. Pinko1.25 06:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
May I ask some reason explaining why Ganser would be of "dubious quality"? And may I require you not to delete sources without debating the matter before? Thanks. Tazmaniacs
- WP:RS. I do not have to debate the removal of poor references. Pinko1.25 09:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
In "NATO's Secret Armies", Ganser uses roughly 700 references in a 250 page book and he's very careful in choosing legitimate sources of information. He's one of the most knowledgeable researchers on Gladio and devoted 7 years of his life to research the phenomenon. What makes you believe that his claims are dubious? Kyle Michelson 13:04, 23 December (UTC)