Talk:Zone Labs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of Business and Economics WikiProject. | |
| Stub | rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
Contents |
[edit] ZA Security Suite
Does ZASS really include the wireless security product? The article implies it does. It also never mentions that ZASS 6.0 supports antispyware. A version history as taken from zonelabs.com would be nice. The antivirus is licensed from CA, the antispyware is supposedly homegrown, though I have trouble believing this. They previously had bundles with Pestpatrol, and some other no name spyware vendor. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.196.90.128 (talk • contribs) 17:07, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] zonealarm redirect to zonelabs
zonealarm is a product of zonelabs. Why should there be a redirect from zonealarm to zonelabs?
If you want than products of companies be redirected to the company article, then merge Microsoft Windows with Microsoft. 59.93.131.6 07:07, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Problems with constant stream
Evildoctorbluetooth 12:42, 21 May 2006 (UTC) It should be noted that zone alarm tends to cause significant lag when used with a contstant stream,particualy noticable in downloading and mmorpgs, in one case the character was standing for 3 min, before the data was transfered. a paragraph called "problems or disadvantages should be added.
[edit] Advertisment
The Products section reads like an advertisment. Fo example, it says "IMSecure protects your AIM, Yahoo!..." in second person. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.197.169.169 (talk • contribs) 15:21, June 12, 2006 (UTC)
[edit] No more support for Windows 98
With ZA's new 6.5 versions, windows versions before Windows2000 are no longer supported. 71.250.17.62 13:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Split into multiple articles
As someone suggested above, it seems strange to have 'ZoneAlarm' redirecting to 'ZoneLabs'. I am working on the article to determine how it could be split into two while still making coherent sense. I'll make the tone less adverty while I'm at it. If anyone has any particular objections to splitting, drop me a line Cynical 12:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
