Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11½

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Talk:Fahrenheit 9

This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Future

This article has been rated as Future-Class on the quality scale.

Unknown

This article has not been rated on the importance assessment scale.

Editing Guidelines

Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:

If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films)
When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fahrenheit 9/11½ article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Archives

HOAX ? i found nothing relevant anyway.

The external link in the Internet Movie Database was written by "anonymous".

I found some comments and the original article but no others informations even at http://www.michaelmoore.com/ no more ;-) --Neuromancien 02:41, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] move to Fahrenheit 9/11½

Can an admin move this to Fahrenheit 9/11½ ... thanks!--Sonjaaa 00:05, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 July, 2005. The result was to keep. An archived record of this vote can be found here.

[edit] Wrong info

On Michael moore's page it says this planned for 2006 release, here it says 2007.--60.226.28.35 10:31, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

Does it matter? It's crystal ball and should've been deleted as such. Grue 12:30, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

I think it would be cool if Michael Moore included the clip of Kayne West saying that "George W. Bush doesn't care about black people." (Ibaranoff24 03:03, 22 October 2005 (UTC))

[edit] information vs propaganda

I do agree that Moore's "stuff", might show a strong opinion, but propaganda is not the right term for it, as it implies a judgment. I'd rather use "information" because it's more generic (you can have good or bad information), and sticks to Wikipedia's policy of NOT giving an opinion. Hiding "propaganda" into "opinionated commentary" might also sound tricky. For these reasons I did reverted - again - the edit to Fahrenheit 9/11½. Nova77 23:21, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Fahrenheit 9/11 was NOT propaganda. But some of his other stuff, such as Bowling for Columbine can be qualified as propaganda, but it's only a matter of opinion. (Ibaranoff24 03:01, 22 October 2005 (UTC))

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../f/a/h/Talk%7EFahrenheit_9_11%C2%BD_9719.html"

Categories: Future-Class film articles | Unassessed importance film articles

Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11½

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] move to Fahrenheit 9/11½

[edit] Wrong info

[edit] information vs propaganda

Views

Navigation

interaction

Search