Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anthropology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Anthropology
Not a good article. Particularly the history is poor, beginning with the history in the US. While US anthro is excellent, precisely a discipline having diversity as its object needs alternative genealogies
Very good article. Meets all Featured Article criteria. --GoOdCoNtEnT 06:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Support - per nom - --GoOdCoNtEnT 06:35, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Why are you weakly supporting nominatons? Shouldn't you be giving full support to articles you nominate? — Deckiller 06:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- I want others to have a stronger deciding role in whether this article should be featured or not. --GoOdCoNtEnT 07:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Why are you weakly supporting nominatons? Shouldn't you be giving full support to articles you nominate? — Deckiller 06:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: lead definately needs to be expanded. 216.58.91.187 16:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Please do not place more than one nomination at a time — this makes it difficult to do each article and its objections justice. Zzzzz 16:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Object. A few quick observations show this is not a featured article right now. It is nice Jeronimo 21:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Lead is too short.
- Lack of inline citations.
- Unannotated list of "fields and subfields"
- Sections dedicated to the USA, France, Britain and "after World War II" indicate poor structure and/or incomplete coverage of the topic.
