Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Beer/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Beer
I made this a FA because I noticed that absinthe is a FA and beer is much more compreshensive. Richardkselby 00:14, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support Richardkselby 00:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Object Many short sections, Lambic Beers only has two sentences and needs expanded. See WP:GTL on how to set up everything from 'See also' on down. The index is too long. Also, you made four errors in making the nomination, which I fixed, but that's not why I'm objecting. 01:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rlevse (talk • contribs). PS...the World consumption needs a total rework.Rlevse 01:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Object. Too many section-stubs (e.g., Lambic beers, Beer around the world, World consumption), and the history section is too short. Pepsidrinka 01:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Object. One main objection, but it's a big one. Beer is full of uncited assertions. —D-Rock 02:55, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- CommentThis is a former FA. See the link on the talk page. Rlevse 10:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Object - too many short sections, not particularly well-referenced.
Ronline ✉ 11:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC) - Object. It's not ready. Referencing is almost non-existant. Various sections need tidying up and developing. The article is taking shape, and possibly has the bare bones of a good structure, but now needs fleshing out. SilkTork 12:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- The TOC is overwhelming, many of hte sections are tiny, and it is severely under-referenced. Raul654 21:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- The biggest problem I can see is the lack of references - there's too few of them for such a sizeable article. Joffeloff 13:03, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The short sections are rather jarring a read, and there are other stragities - why is skunking mentioned in the intro, for example? May also be somewhat too focused on the States. WilyD 19:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
