Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Super Bowl champions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] List of Super Bowl champions
I just fancied up this list from Super Bowl, and added a sort of timeline going down the right hand side of the page. It can be removed if you think it takes away from the list.
--- 
Phoenix2 Canada Day Weekend! 2 July 2005 20:46 (UTC)
- Support nice list. But for those not familiar to this sport something should be mentioned about AFC and NFC. Differences et al. User:Nichalp/sg July 3, 2005 06:09 (UTC)
-
- I'll put something in there about the fact that the NFL is split into two conferences. Phoenix2 Canada Day Weekend! 3 July 2005 18:12 (UTC)
- I'll put something in there about the fact that the NFL is split into two conferences.
- Support It's a fantastic list, but I have two requests - it should be mentioned at the end of the article that the proposed plan for a west side stadium in New York has been practically abandoned after the unfavorable vote a month ago. And, though my memory might be failing me, I believe that by the time of the Kansas City-Minnesota game, it was already called the Super Bowl rather than the NFL-AFL championship. Could somebody look into this?--Sophitus July 3, 2005 20:58 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for the support, I'm not sure about when they started calling it the Super Bowl; I copied the information from the list that was on the Super Bowl page. Phoenix2 Canada Day Weekend! 3 July 2005 21:32 (UTC)
- Well, the games that are AFL-NFL Championships were called Super Bowls, they are just under that title because they were prior to the 1970 merger of the AFL and NFL.
Phoenix2 4th of July! 01:04 (UTC)
- Thanks for the support, I'm not sure about when they started calling it the Super Bowl; I copied the information from the list that was on the Super Bowl page.
- Support, well done and color coordianted and it also serves as a handy predictor of the stock market. This link is Broken 4 July 2005 04:58 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for the support. Phoenix2 4th of July! 16:14 (UTC)
- Thanks for the support.
- Support, subject to the following: there is a problem with the images: in the classic skin, all of the images are bunched up across the top of the articles, rather than (as I guess is intended) running down the side of the page. This is a known skin problem. If all the images have same width, the problem can be worked by putting all of them in a float-right table (for an example, the portraits about half way through John Vanbrugh). In addition, the tables have slightly different cell widths, which looks a little messy - can they be made consistent. -- ALoan (Talk) 5 July 2005 12:35 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for the support, when I have time I'll reformat the pictures on the right. Phoenix2 5 July 2005 15:32 (UTC)
- Great - one further point: the way the dates are rendered breaks user preferences (day month versus month day) - I know this is a US article, and I guess you have done this to save column width, but it is a bit annoying. -- ALoan (Talk) 5 July 2005 17:37 (UTC)
- Yea, I did format it as such to save column space, I forgot about Wikipedia rendering dates differently based on preferences. Phoenix2 5 July 2005 20:49 (UTC)
- Great - one further point: the way the dates are rendered breaks user preferences (day month versus month day) - I know this is a US article, and I guess you have done this to save column width, but it is a bit annoying. -- ALoan (Talk) 5 July 2005 17:37 (UTC)
- Thanks for the support, when I have time I'll reformat the pictures on the right. Phoenix2 5 July 2005 15:32 (UTC)
