User talk:Fernvale
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Fernvale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Gflores Talk 15:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Image Copyrights
I afraid Image:05OCTWISSK N4C1 img.jpg, Image:05OCTWISSK N4C2 img.jpg, Image:05OCTWISSK N4C5 img.jpg, Image:05OCTWISSK N4C6 img.jpg can't stay on the website, because they do not allow free commerical re-production. Wikipedia requires images uploaded to allow commerical reproduction. Please see Wikipedia:Image use policy for more information.
I hope you will understand the rationale, and don't get discouraged though - I think one of our fellow Wikipedian, User:Sengkang has some good photos, taken by himself, on the Sengkang district that can be inserted on Fernvale. :)
- Best regards, Mailer Diablo 00:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] new town mergers
I disagree. Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:SGpedians' notice board and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Singaporean places, they should be separate articles because the new town is a urban planning entity, distinct from the geographical entity known as "Sengkang, Ang Mo Kio", etc. Furthermore, other entities located within that geographical area are distinct. Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 17:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Also, I hope you don't mind me if I rollback the edits you made on the article talk pages - we should centralise discussion instead. Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 17:31, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree with natalina. --Sengkang 03:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Lift Upgrading Programme
Welcome to wikipedia. I notice that some text in the article Lift Upgrading Programme, which you created, are obtained from HDB website. For example, sentences in the lead section are identical to those found in HDB InfoWEB: Lift Upgrading Programme. There are also some text taken from [1]. These violate copyright and the sentences need to be either rewritten or removed. In addition, I failed to understand how the image Image:Electro-highrise.jpg is relevant to the article. Please address these concerns, thanks. --Vsion 10:33, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Build To Order
Some sentences in Build To Order were taken verbatim from hdb. Again, please address these concerns. --Vsion 10:38, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RE: /* ... */ in edit summary
Hi, just to drop by. Please don't include the /* and */ in your edit summaries, it gives the appearance that there is a section with the same name as your edit summary text when there actually isn't. On the other hand, if the wiki software inserts the /* and */ for you in the edit summary, it's fine as it serves to denote which section you edited. Just don't add them into the edit summary yourself, please. :) If you add this in, it is not considred an edit summary. :( Thanks for your cooperation. --Terence Ong 15:30, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Find the rest of the Singapore community!
Yeap, you can find us in these pages:
- Singapore portal
- SGpedians' notice board
- Singapore Collaboration of the Fortnight
- Singapore-related topics
- Category:Wikipedians in Singapore
- {{User Singapore}} (Singapore userbox)
Do leave your name at the notice board, and thanks again for making wikipedia your online abode! ;) --Terence Ong 15:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Singaporean murder victims
Hello. Recently you listed the above category for deletion, however did not include your nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. Please complete your nomination so that others may begin to debate whether or not the category deletion will proceed. Thanks. -- Longhair 11:45, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please don't tag all your edits as minor
Hello, I've recently looked at your contributions and you tagged everything as minor. I believe you saved it as part of your preferences. If you wouldn't mind, could you uncheck the box in the preferences section as if you make major edits and you tag it as minor, people won't really notice them. Its best to uncheck it and tag edits as minor only when making small changes. Thanks. --Terence Ong 06:47, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ship table header
Just curious, but why are you using a header which includes text-align:left; , which requires you to manually override it by adding align="center" to every header cell?
—wwoods 20:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
text-align:left is for text align left instead of justify, align="center" is for picture and desc comment
Template:Infobox Ship - Another version! Fernvale 14:46, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
| First Col | Second Col |
|---|---|
| 1st item | 2nd item |
| First Col | Second Col |
|---|---|
| 1st item | 2nd item |
| First Col | Second Col |
|---|---|
| 1st item | 2nd item |
| First Col | Second Col |
|---|---|
| 1st item | 2nd item |
- But by default, ordinary cells (beginning with "|") are left-aligned and header cells (beginning with "!") are centered and bolded. In my browser, tables 1, 3, and 4 look identical. Your header overrides the centering, so you have to override that in each header cell, which seems needlessly complicated. —wwoods 19:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ship table edits
I noticed you're spiffing up a bunch of ship data tables. Have you considered changing them to use {{Infobox Ship}} instead? --J Clear 23:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Windows Vienna
I've reverted all your edits where you changed Windows "Vienna" to "Windows Seven". I'm quite certain that you don't have any reliable sources to back up this change, and Verifiability is a cornerstone Wikipedia policy which you (and I, and everyone else) are expected to follow. Sorry, no, Mary Jo Foley's blog does not qualify as a reliable source... if and when we see public statements from Microsoft employees who are in a position to state that the code name for this project has changed, then that's when we can change things at Wikipedia. Until then, leave it alone... -/- Warren 06:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
