Talk:Fire and Movement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. | ||||||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||
|
|||||||
The article as it is, talks about suppressive fire and not fire and movement. Definately needs some looking into.--Elmeri B. Suokirahvi 11:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
This needs some verification and some links to other articles if it is to continue to exist. Not really sure if it should, but not sure enough that I am going to list it for speedy delete. Just needs some looking into.
I've altered this page as best I can. Needs to be looked at by an expert though as I don't have vast knowledge on this subject and have only done bits and pieces (as is evident by lack of links etc.) Hope ive made an improvement on what was here before though. Tom Lavender 0522 (BST) 10 July 2006
[edit] Wikified
Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! A little section formatting, mostly. Added an "expert" tag as requested above. JubalHarshaw 18:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Citations
I am able to cite the majority of the talking points of this page using US Army Field Manuals. I was wondering if that would serve as an acceptable source? as I am no expert on the subject, just an avid reader on the topic. Cowboy357 06:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Would be great! MadMaxDog 09:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Do Not Merge
Fire and movement is one of the key principles of warfare, not restricted to being a modern infantry tactic it is also relevant to tank warfare i.e. blitzkreig Historical examples include mongol tactics etc. Although it is currently a stub, further work will make this a full and useful article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bob Hu (talk • contribs) 05:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC).
