User talk:Flaxton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Wick and Wick Bay
Wondering why exactly you have merged Wick Bay with Wick, Caithness. I would prefer to keep them as separate articles, as Thurso and Thurso Bay now are. Laurel Bush 11:17, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC).
I have added a reference to Wick Bay in the second paragraph of Wick, Caithness. Laurel Bush 11:27, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC).
Also, Im now thinking Old Wick Castle deserves an article of its own, with a link from Wick, Caithness. Laurel Bush 14:45, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC).
Sorry if you think I've messed up your article! It just seemed more cohesive to have them as the same article. I was in two minds whether to do that or just link it in some way but when I read the Wikipedia article it just seemed the right thing.
Same for Wick Castle, I just thought it'd fill out the Wick article a bit more. Plus I like my photos :-)
Yes. The photo looks could. But I still think town, bay and castle deserve separate articles. Dont know what sort of photo would best represent the town. Laurel Bush 15:54, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC).
And I am wondering how the bay might look in a photo from North Head or South Head. Laurel Bush 15:56, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC).
That might be a good photo of the bay. As for the town, I was thinking maybe looking up the river from Sommerfield's carpark toward Bridge Street?
[edit] RGLE, etc.
I think that your comment in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regular Grand Lodge of England probably sums the matter up perfectly. While tidying up after them, I deleted the link to bessel.org from Regular Masonic jurisdictions because it looked a bit out of place.
Believe it or not, it has taken me three hours to realise that you were responsible for both! I have no objection to your putting back a link or links to bessel.org. But:
- not as a raw link - put a few words of description
- possibly link to somewhere further down the tree, eg. to http://bessel.org/masonic_info.htm
- possibly in Freemasonry (which has a mass of external links) as well / instead.
Thanks for your support. Sadly, today's deletions are probably not the end of the matter, please watch the title - yes, you can watch a page that does not exist! I am not of the craft but having seen the RGLE article appear in July, I was simply following the matter up for the sake of Wikipedia. Also I strongly object to a few foreigners coming here and so arrogantly telling English people how to behave. -- RHaworth 11:39, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:UGLEArms.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 00:53, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
