Template talk:FOLDOC
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The indentation of the FOLDOC boilerplate makes it look unusual on some pages, e.g. Apache HTTP Server, where it follows a bulleted list. Does anyone object dropping the ':' in the template, and just adding it to those pages where it is required? -- Jon Dowland 17:45, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. See, for example, Antinomy. Ideally the References section in that article would contain "* {{1911}}" and "* {{FOLDOC}}", but because of the ':' this can't be done. Will change in a few days if no-one replies. --Romanski 14:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, since most articles include this in the References section anyway, I think the colon should be changed to an asterisk. Will change in a few days if no-one replies. --Romanski 10:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pre-discussion for deletion
From the template:
- ...which is licensed under the GFDL.
Why should FOLDOC be attributed on the actual page when it's contributions are no different than mine or any other wikipedian? If the content is not attributed in the page's history then it should be, at best, a reference.
Again, why are FOLDOC's GFDL contributions more special than mine to merit this template? Cburnett 16:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- I have posted this for deletion since there was no response. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 December 31. Cburnett 04:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
