Talk:Francesca Dani
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | ||
I've proposed deleting this because it seems to be simply promotion material aimed at driving clicks to the model's paysite. She may well be noteworthy, but the page needs to be written with full NPOV. Bedesboy 15:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- References showing she is the subject of multiple published works, per WP:BIO, have been added. --Oakshade 04:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] why is this here?
Why hasn't this page been deleted? How is this relevant to anything? I'm not sure how this would be of noteworthy information on Wikipedia. -Pickle
I agree, why is this here? She's not a well-known model at all, nor is she even employed by a famous modeling agency. Most models on wiki are employed by either well-known fashion designers or by a famous modeling agency. Francesca Dani is barely known. I call for deletion. - Kimba
[edit] Unreferenced attack
I removed the bizarre "Questions" section. That "she buys costumes without giving credit to their creators" does not in any way negate her notoriety. And the "proof" apparently being these links ->[1] [2] ... which don't seem to have anything to do with this challenge (or anything else for that matter). The first being a cryptic http protocol listing and the other being an old eBay auction. The real references in the article demonstrate great notoriety in cosplay. It appears the sellar of the unknown eBay item (i'm guessing a costume) is in a private credit dispute witht the model and is using Wikipedia in some kind of personal vendetta. Wikipedia isn't a place to display personal gripes at article subjects. --Oakshade 18:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
No this is not an unreferenced "attack" in any way. It was printed in a respectable manner, with links that show the commissioners of costumes she claims to of made herself. Please explain to me how that "has nothing to do with anything". These are FACTS. Isn't that was wikipedia is for? FACTS? This isn't a personal page for this model to put "fun facts" up about herself. It is supposed to be a reliable informational source..wheter it be positive or negative information about something. And for that matter, why is this page even here in the first place? There is no justified reason she should have a page on wikipedia.
- The links provided, as explained above, show nothing but an old eBay auction. That there is a costume credit dispute does not change this model's celebrity status. As stated in WP:Biographies of living persons, "Unsourced or poorly sourced controversial (negative, positive, or just highly questionable) material about living persons should be removed immediately from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, and user pages." And as far as the page being here, 1. an editor created the article and 2, there are many third party published works on this person establishing notability. A personal costume credit dispute doesn't belong here. --Oakshade 23:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
