Talk:Friedrich Hayek/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The article covers the subject very well. The picture, infobox, and subheaders help make it a better article. Good amount of references too. However, more links should be added at the end, and a copyedit would be helpful. Green caterpillar 14:20, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
This article is one of wiki's worst examples of idol-worshipping hagiography. It ignores notable criticisms by the likes of Amartya Sen,Emma Rothschild, Pat Devine, Michael A. Lebowitz, John McMurtry, Maurice Dobb, Chris Harman and Hilary Wainwright to name just a few of the direct and relatively recent confrontations with his work. And since the contributors here are all true-believers to the last man, claims about Hayek's status, particularly in the field of sociology, have been predictably exaggerated.70.55.81.133 17:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
