Talk:Fundamental
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Should this page really be in the Category:Fundamental? That don't seem right... - dcljr 19:15, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Definition
I thought a fundamental wasn't just "something basic"; it was something so basic that it couldn't be built out of more basic things (eg a proton is not a fundamental particle - properly called an elementary particle - but an electron appears to be). Brianjd | Why restrict HTML? | 06:58 26 Nov 2004
- I've fixed this and added a reference. Brianjd | Why restrict HTML? | 08:16, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
[edit] Fundamentalism
The Fundamental article implies that the term "fundamentalism" is mainly used with religion. The Fundamentalism article implies that the term "fundamentalism" is only used with religion. Which is correct? Brianjd | Why restrict HTML? | 05:11, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Clean
A did a clean per MoS. There was the following dicdef. Maybe it has a place in Wikipedia:
- In the area of knowledge management, a fundamental category illuminates a relationship between the subjects and objects of knowledge. A fundamental is basic; it is important because it is something that other things can be built upon.
--Commander Keane 20:54, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
