Talk:Gadget
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Deletion discussion
This article has been listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion in the past. See /deletion for the discussion archive.
[edit] External links
Sorry, maybe I've placed the link in the wrong category. I guess I should have placed it under References and not External links. But why do you say the link I placed was commercial? There was another one, which was not placed by me; may it was that link which made you erase both the text and the link. I ask you to reconsider you decision about my contributions, because I do it for everyone, and if you think logically, there is almost no way (at least yet), you can find sourced information on this particular topic.
I'm writing this to User:Ohnoitsjamie. I see that you like communicating with other members of wikipedia through talk pages so I didn't want to trash up your personal talk page with this message. Siliconov 09:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Rv
I couldn't find any other classification of gadgets anywhere, so I placed my own classification back. The site I linked to the article is my reference source, I hope you will not see it as a commercial again, as it is not. If you still wish to delete everything I contribute to the community, please give me reasons for that, because I do it for everyone and not for me. I don't benefit from this... Siliconov 07:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- A review site with ads does not meet WP:Reliable sources criteria. OhNoitsJamie Talk 07:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 2 years later and it is still basically a definition page
Perhaps this needs to be revisited. This article, by the nature of its topic, will not progress further than giving a definition of gadget and a few weak examples (which imo violate pov since what you think is a gadget I might not). Fully 1/2 of this entry is a definition/entymology and the other half can be taken care of by a list. KsprayDad 18:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
