Geniocracy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
| Beliefs & Practices |
|
Geniocracy |
| History & People |
|
History of Raëlism |
| Associations |
Geniocracy is the framework for a system of government proposed by the International Raëlian Movement, which advocates problem-solving and creative intelligence as a criteria for regional governance.[1]
Contents |
[edit] Definition
- See also: Intelligence and Genius
The term geniocracy comes from the word 'Genius' and proposes a system that is designed to select for intelligence as the primary factor for governance. While having a democratic electoral apparatus, it differs from traditional liberal democracy by instead suggesting that both candidates for office and the body electorate should meet a certain minimal criterion of problem-solving or creative intelligence. The thresholds proposed by the Raëlians are 50% above the average mean for an electoral candidate and 10% above the average mean for an elector.[1]
[edit] Justifying the method of selection
This method of selectivity is deliberate so as to address what the concept considers to be flaws in the current systems of democracy. The primary object of criticism is the inability of majoritarian consensus to provide a reasonable platform for intelligent decision making for the purpose of solving problems permanently. Geniocracy's criticism of this system is that the institutions of democracy become more concerned with appealing to popular consensus through emotive issues than they are in making long-term critical decisions, especially those that may involve issues not immediately relevant to the electorate. It asserts that political mandate is something far too important to simply leave to popularity, and asserts that the critical decision making required for government, especially in a world of globalisation, cannot be based on criteria of emotive or popular decision making. In this respect, Geniocracy derides Liberal Democracy as a form of "Mediocracy".[1]
[edit] Agenda
- See also: Humanitarianism (Economic)
Part of the Geniocratic agenda is to purport the idea of a world government system, deriding the current state-system as inadequate for dealing with contemporary global issues that are typical of Globalisation, such as Environmentalism, Social Justice, Human Rights, and the current economic system. In line with this, Geniocracy proposes a different economic model called Humanitarianism.[1]
[edit] Response to criticism
As a response to its controversial attitudes about selectivity one of the more general responses is to point out that universal suffrage, the current system, already discriminates to some degree and varyingly in different countries, in who is allowed to vote. Primarily against minors, incarcerated felons, and the mentally incapacitated. This is on the basis that their ability to contribute to the decision making process is either flawed or invalid for the purpose of the society.
[edit] Status
The current difficulty in the ideas of Geniocracy is that the means of assessing intelligence are ill-defined. Standard measures of testing (such as IQ) may be inadequate for the purposes of testing for Geniocracy, as they only measure a very small part of a subject's intelligence. Other components deemed necessary for a more rounded understanding of intelligence include concepts like Emotional Intelligence. As such, Geniocracy's validity cannot really be assessed until better and more objective methods of intelligence assessment are made available.
The matter of confronting moral problems that may arise is not addressed in the book Geniocracy; many leaders may be deeply intelligent and charismatic (having both high emotional/social intelligence and IQ) according to current means of measuring such factors, but no current scientific tests are a reliable enough measure for one's ability to make humanitarian choices (although online tests such as those used by retail chains to select job applicants may be relevant). The lack of scientific rigor necessary for inclusion of Geniocracy as properly testable political ideology can be noted in number of modern and historical dictatorships as well as oligarchies.
[edit] Democratically defined regions
The author of Geniocracy recommends (though, does not necessitate) a world government with 12 regions. The regions would be defined by votes of the inhabitants on what region they want to partake in. After the regions are defined, they are further divided into 12 sectors after the same principle of democracy is applied. While sectors of the same region are defined as having equal numbers of inhabitants, the regions themselves may have different levels of population, which would be proportional to its voting power.[1]
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- Rael, La géniocratie. L'Edition du message, 1977. ISBN 2-88395-003-2.
[edit] External links
- http://geniocracy.net - The Geniocracy Project
Forms and Styles of Leadership: see also Form of government
|
