User talk:Genomist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Do not bring a racial agenda to the Wikipedia, including pseudoscientific edits to support a nationalist agenda. In your case, it is revisionist Balkan separatism based upon hypothetical beliefs on the origins of Slavic Croats with the Ottoman Muslims. This is your first warning; review WP:POINT. Lord Loxley 15:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Go warn yourself, you are a vandal. Genomist 17:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Pushing a racialist agenda here will win you nothing. Review Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox Lord Loxley 19:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Cavallisforzageneclusters.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cavallisforzageneclusters.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 16:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- I personally scanned it from the book. Genomist 17:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- That doesn't create a new licensing opportunity. In order to fix the license problem, we need to know the copyright details of the image. When was the book it was from published? Jkelly 20:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- It was published in 1994. Genomist 22:53, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Croats
Hello. I did look at the page and it seems that there is a lot of confusion as to the usage of the terminology. Croats, as either related to the Iranian peoples or Persians is speculative. I'm not saying it's not possible that there are some links (I'd say more likely the Alans/Sarmatians rather than Persians), including possibly substantial ones, but I don't know what you can do other than seek arbitration or call an admin. to discuss things further. What should be emphasized is that various theories are just that, theories and that there isn't necessarily any indication or attempt at proclaiming some sort of ethnic-centric purity or anything of that sort. Tombseye 17:54, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
