Talk:Great White Brotherhood
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Noncompliant tag justification
These are the items that I think would improve the article:
- How many people in the world belong to the Brotherhood?
- How are they distributed geographically?
- Provide sources from "reliable and reputable sources". According to Wikipedia:No_original_research#Origin_of_this_policy:_the_opinion_of_Wikipedia.27s_founder, "It can be quite difficult for us to make any valid judgment as to whether a particular thing is true or not. ... But what we can do is check whether or not it actually has been published in reputable journals or by reputable publishers. So it's quite convenient to avoid judging the credibility of things by simply sticking to things that have been judged credible by people much better equipped to decide." It is especially hard to judge the credibility of external websites. Any web page can claim to be "official". It is particularly confusing when one group disputes the truth of another web page, as is the case here (see Talk:Peter Deunov. "If an article topic has no reputable sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on that topic." (Wikipedia:Verifiability) --Walter Siegmund (talk) 23:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] This article describes a number of hardly related subjects
This article should be split and should be made into a disambiguation page. The Ukrananian sect should have its own article. Andries 21:07, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
