Talk:Group cohomology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In the column "Formal construction", is there a "g_n+1" missing in the definition of d^n?
no.
The only reference link, Turkelli, Szilágyi, Lukács: Cohomology of Groups, is a broken link.
The formula for d^n does look a little strange.
- I think the g0 in front of the first term and the g_i in the second term are probably mistakes. 69.234.20.113 10:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone know why the last equation of the "cochain complexes" section is so small? As this is where we're defining H^n it should be bigger, if anything. I looked at the code and it seems normal to me. Owen Jones
