Talk:Guna
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Merge proposal of Satvic into Guna
I think Satvic is a developed enough article to stand on its own. And it's nice to search for "Satvic" and immediately get the article about it, rather than having to scroll through Guna. Therefore I oppose merging. What do others think? --Krubo 14:01, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
I agree with Keenan Pepper - somebody should write actual articles for Rajas and Tamas and integrate Sattva, Rajas and Tamas via a common page.
- I oppose merging, for same reason as Krubo's. —AugPi 04:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- I also oppose merging for the same reasons as Krubo. —bartonfriedland 03:45, 01 August 2006 (UTC)
- Then will someone actually do something about it and write articles for Tamas and Rajas? —Keenan Pepper 03:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
