Talk:Hagbard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Merge
Hagbard and Signy should be Merged to the Hagbard page. The direction of the merge is dictated by the former's dependence on the involvement of the latter. As for the reasoning behind a merge, the formal is an integral part of the mythology of the latter, albeit that Hagbard has other tales concerning him. Furthermore, the Hagbard page is, at the moment, quite sparse, despite the fact that it has articles in three other [language] Wikipedias, whereas the Hagbard and Signy page is of moderate length, despite having no counterparts in other Wikis. 24.126.199.129 06:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge Do not merge
Support the merge. Rather this that the article with Signe in the Hagbard and Signy is the appropriate direction for this to go. Both a better article and a more balanced title. Hagbard can be redirect to Hagbard and Signy. Williamborg (Bill) 04:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC) After reviewing/copy editing the articles and examining the web (1,640 hits) I'm convinced there is enough material for two separate articles. Wikipedia is not paper. Save them both... Williamborg (Bill) 04:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
I have expanded the article. I doubt that many would like to merge them now.--Berig 19:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
