Talk:Hagrid's pets
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Harry Potter, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter universe. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. | ||||
|
|||||
Contents |
[edit] Fluffy
I moved Talk:Fluffy (Harry Potter) here then added the "Fluffy" heading above and made the following heading be one level down from before. Brianjd 09:25, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
[edit] Flute given by Hagrid?
Harry, Ron and Hermione used a flute that had been given to Harry by Hagrid.
Was this in the book? It definitely wasn't in the movie. The article seems to imply that Fluffy was only important in book 1. Brianjd 08:05, 2004 Dec 16 (UTC)
- Yes it was. In the book, Harry, Ron and Hermione used a flute that was given to Harry by Hagrid for Christmas to lull Fluffy to sleep. They did see a harp left behind by Quirrell, but it didn't continue to play as it did in the film. Fluffy was only important in the first book/film, considering he hasn't been seen since.
-
- Actually, in the film, they had to jump into the hole when it stopped playing unexpectedly. Brianjd 08:41, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
-
-
- Actually, in the film, they had to jump into the hole when it stopped playing unexpectedly. While true, may I ask how this is relevant?
-
[edit] As his name suggests...
As his name suggests, Fluffy belongs to Hagrid, who got him from a Greek person he met in a pub.
Huh? Brianjd 09:52, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
- Well, Hagrid's partically the only person on Earth who would name a giant three-headed monster "Fluffy."
[edit] Categories
Category:Fictional dogs and Category:Fictional dragons are appropriate categories. The original pages (Fang (Harry Potter) and Norbert (Harry Potter)) were under them, weren't they? Brianjd 09:33, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
- But Norbert and Aragog aren't dogs. I think it would be prudent to stick to the categories all the entries fall into.
-
- But then the categories are incomplete. What was wrong with the way it was before these articles were merged? Brianjd 09:46, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
-
-
- Just my opinin, but adding categories that don't apply to everything makes the page look cluttered. Before they were merged, the category applied to the whole page, but now they do not.
-
