User talk:Hanfresco
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
哈思呼哩氏 Hacihuri Hala 见于《清朝通典·氏族略·满洲八旗姓》，世居伯都讷。锡伯族姓氏亦有哈思呼理，世居不详，后改汉字姓韩、哈等。
韩佳氏 Hangiya Hala 见于《八旗满洲姓氏通谱》，世居不详，后改汉字姓韩。
罕扎氏 Hanja Hala 见于《清朝通典·氏族略·满洲八旗姓》，满语“廉洁、清洁”， 世居巴颜和罗地方，后改汉字姓韩，著名人物有：云骑尉台弼图。
翰颜氏 Hanyan Hala 见于《清朝通典·氏族略·满洲八旗姓》，世居赫林台、嫩河（黑龙江省嫩江市附近）等地，后改汉字姓韩。
吉喇特氏 Gilate Hala 本蒙古姓氏，见于《清朝通典·氏族略·满洲八旗姓》，世居察哈尔，后改汉字姓韩。著名人物有：二等子班第思奇普。
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Revolutionary_Army#Organization
- http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/64093/67507/4861954.html
- http://www.cnhubei.com/200503/ca745804.htm
- http://202.84.17.11/world/htm/20000928/146511.htm
- http://www.hb.xinhuanet.com/people/2004-03/25/content_1848552.htm
- http://www.ndcnc.gov.cn/datalib/2004/Celeb/DL/DL-1990
- http://mil.fjii.fj.vnet.cn/2002-07-28/lajldsm_521.htm
[edit] Explanation of my explanation :-)
Your user page is a copy of the Han (surname) article. However, when you copied the text of the article to your user page, you also copied the [[Category:category name]] and the {{stub-name}} codes that put your user page into the same categories ("Chinese family names", "China stubs", etc) as the article. Our user page guidelines state that this is not a good thing to do - user pages should not share the same categories as articles, as that may be confusing for people looking at the categories.
To fix this problem, I have enclosed all the problematic codes in <nowiki> ... </nowiki> tags. This will allow the original code to be included in the article while not putting your user page in categories meant only for articles. The rest of the article has been left untouched.
If you wish to move your user page text into the article itself, just copy the text into the article and remove the <nowiki> ... </nowiki> tags. Kimchi.sg 03:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- When the article's title already serves as the correct sort order, you don't need to insert a sort key... --Nlu (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- Didn't know that; thx Hanfresco 18:44, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Han (surname)
First of all, please don't take possession of the article. Articles are not "ours". It doesn't work that way. Wikipedia is collaborative. Secondly, the section in question already has the expand tag. I felt like the stub tag was redundant in a case like that. --Woohookitty(meow) 21:59, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
