Talk:Harbhajan Singh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] CCOTM
Can we get started? not much time left before the world cup.--Thugchildz 03:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Coming. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Also are we going to have a peer review or just start without one? Well i think we need to have a peer review--Thugchildz 03:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
I did it up to the end of 2005. Only one more year of chronology to go, and then we only need the quotes and pundit reaction. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Do you think listing of MoM & MoS awards will add value? If so - i can volunteer for the same -- Kalyan 14:30 26 February 2007
- I guess Wikipedia:Peer review/Harbhajan Singh may answer the question. If so, I'd be grateful if you could help. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Question
>> Nevertheless, he has the highest average amongst current players batting in the No. 4 position.
What is this stat ? From what I can find, he has never batted at No.4 in Tests and was out for 1 on the only occasion in ODIs Tintin 03:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Under performer
-
- nowadays the performance of harbhajan singh is not up to the mark. Before deleting the segment of article , it is expected to discuss pros and cons . saravan_p 5th March
[edit] Language too informal
Yeah, his performance isn't up to the mark, but your grammar & language is not the way to make edits. You are welcome to make the edits if your language is correct
Srikeit 05:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Nowadays his performance level has been diminishing considerably. He is struggling to get his rhythm right. He was severely punished by Shahid Afrid in the recent tour of Pakistan. Not penetrative in bowling as one in against Australia in 2001. In many of his recent outings, he is simply playing wicketless. With the performance against Australia in hand, he is surviving in the Indian cricket team squad.
But a very minor change I have made, as to meet the Wikipedia's standard, we have to write in unusual way. There is also one more Wikipedia in simple English, where we can use simple phrases and words. I feel nothing wrong in the changes I have made in the initial article. Srikeit, why can't you edit the same article with same stuff in your own language, as you have agreed the essence of the matter which we are investigating.
saravan_p 18:00 IST 5th march 2006
[edit] "Subsequent"
There are still seven "subsequent"s left in the article; they do jar somewhat. --Dweller 10:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] FAC comments
I don't want a couple of my FAC comments to be lost:
- a career summary table (batting/bowling figures against the other Test nations, like those at the bottom of Paul Collingwood and [[Adam Gilchrist]) would be good
- a batting Manhattan graph is unlikely to be very instructive, but what about a similar thing for bowling average?
But congratulations to the authors on a fine featured article :) -- ALoan (Talk) 11:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Batting Strike Rate
The reference for this statement re: Harbhajan's SR shows it to be incorrect, so I'm removing it. Please do revert this if it's a mistake. Kaushik twin 18:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Categories: Wikipedia featured articles | Old requests for peer review | Biography articles of living people | FA-Class cricket articles | Mid-importance cricket articles | FA-Class biography articles | WikiProject Punjab articles | FA-Class Punjab articles | Low-importance Punjab articles | Indian portal selected articles | Past Indian collaborations of the week | FA-Class India articles | FA-Class India articles of Low-importance | Low-importance India articles