User talk:Here
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
archives: archive01
[edit] do say hello
-
-
- new comments at the bottom of page, or leave a new note.
- wikipedia:talk_page_guidelines is worth a read.
- time to my last edit is a good indicator for response time.
- try tetris and go if you need a distraction...
- email if I don't answer here.
-
[edit] Bicycle Day
started at user_talk:zoe
Why did you delete the Bicycle Day article? At one point there was a good article there. Any nonsense would have been vandalism. Alphonze 10:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. I find this appropriate for an article. Sources:
- Hofmann, Albert (1981): LSD, My Problem Child. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-029325-2
- maps bulletin v16n2
- The first LSD trip, April 19, 1943, is also widely known as “Bicycle Day” because of Hofmann’s wild bike ride from his lab to his home through the streets of Basel, full of perceptual distortions, not knowing whether he would ever return from his madness.
- Would you please undelete it? Without knowledge of the prior content, I can't be certain, but I do not feel this qualifies for speedy. Otherwise, we can just recreate. ∴ here…♠ 18:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
It's blatant nonsense. If you recreate it, I'll re-delete it and salt the earth. Take it to DRV. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Bicycle Day to WP:DRV based on:
- new york times Jan 7 2006, THE SATURDAY PROFILE; Nearly 100, LSD's Father Ponders His 'Problem Child -- Bicycle day noted as named date.
- maps bulletin - Also in print, widely distributed, scientific journal. The first LSD trip, April 19, 1943, is also widely known as “Bicycle Day” because of Hofmann’s wild bike ride from his lab to his home through the streets of Basel.
- erowid established resource for psychoactive plants and chemicals and related issues. Bicycle day noted in Hoffmann's summary.
- Island Views E-Zine #2 - Bicycle Day Commemorative Issue
- Many local, often less publicized events taking place on April 19th.
- Regardless of the outcome on this article, you really made a mistake here by skipping AfD. At the very least deserves a redirect. I'll chalk it up to honest misunderstanding, or plain 'ol laziness. Thanks as always for all your work. ∴ here…♠ 02:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] List of noteworthy raves
This is up for AFD here. As you were involved in the discussions to create this I thought you should be no ==
This is up for AFD here. As you were involved in the discussions to create this I thought you should be notified. Rex the first talk | contribs 00:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, keep up the nice work ;) ∴ here…♠ 00:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
Hi, Here. Concerning the message you left me, yes it was a mistake. Actually, VandalProof froze and stopped responding. I think this might be a bug in the software. Thank you for correcting this error and for spending your time making Wikipedia a better place.
Cheers! --Meno25 00:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Withdrawing AfD nominations
Just so you know, the traditional way to do this is to post on the AfD's discussion that you're withdrawing it. Someone will then be along to close the AfD properly. Blanking the page and db-empty'ing has a similar effect, but it mucks up the records and so on. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Noted. Thanks for fixing it. ∴ here…♠ 01:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
for the welcome and the links. Those were very helpful, I love the "don't be a dick"... priceless! Cool place here. -Theory —The preceding unsigned comment was added by R.N.Theory (talk • contribs) 07:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Hi Mike,
Thanks for you message and the welcome, the bio/article will have more resources/info soon but at the moment i still have to get used to wiki. Also thanks for fixing the other url, i kinda created that one by accident, hehe. Gr4ff 02:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
As if it never happened. :) -GTBacchus(talk) 07:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Talk Rave
I noticed that you reinserted Abnerian comment. I looked at Abnerian edit history and all the recent edits are removing comments, I think it is a bit strange so I reverted the rave removal. Just thought I should explain why I did this! Rex the first talk | contribs 01:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- I re-removed the comment! No problems, I figured it was harmless as it was his own and un-addressed. After re-reading m:Right to vanish, I'd probably leave it alone next time. Thanks for all your help on this and other articles .. I hope to continue seeing you around ;). See you someday in the woods by the bassbins. ∴ here…♠ 01:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Monobook edit
Hello, Here, I wanted to let you know that I have edited your monobook file because it was incorrectly appearing in Category:AfD debates (Not yet sorted). This should not cause any problems for you, but if it should for some reason please make sure that you do not reinsert yourself in the category when you fix it. Thanks, Prodego talk 17:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Inline citation
Yes I agree with you about (this).
I've redirected the hyperlink for inline citations in WP:WIAGA to the section on Inline citations in WP:CITE, and put in a missing hyperlink from there to Wikipedia:Inline_citation for anyone wanting to read the "essay" - which has the further link to the stub article Inline citation towards which WP:WIAGA originally uselessly directed people. I hope this solves the problem but being new to Wiki I dont know if this is a generic change that can be reinforced with bots in other places. Please let me know if so and if this is helpful! I want to use my energies where they are needed! Lucy Skywalker 14:43, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note! I removed the link from WP:CITE to wp:Inline Citations, as I feel it confuses and dilutes the already confusing introduction. Your work on the citations guidelines is appreciated -- an important and difficult task ;). Good luck, drop any questions my way.. ∴ here…♠ 15:06, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
