Talk:Hirschsprung's disease
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Who changed my edit?? That was my research paper! you dont know what you are talking about anyway
You are writing for a collaborative encyclopedia, and even if your research is accurate beyond our wildest dreams, it will need to be published elsewhere first before we can quote it.
- You style is also rather narrative, which is not necessarily ideal for an encylcopedia. I think a list of the symptoms and therapies is more important than its historical context. JFW | T@lk 21:36, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I think that this is an encyclopedia that ANYONE can edit. Also, this stuff is not original, but it's not plagurized either...it's an accurate essay that does not have any "new ideas". It works. Leave it alone.
- Yes, ANYONE can edit Wikipedia, but we are trying to make an encyclopedia, not a suspense novel on the history of aganglionosis of the rectum. Wikipedia, in the end, is for the purpose of the reader and not for a contributor who decides that his work should be in there.
- Please have a look at any other medical article (such as Crohn's disease) and adopt a different style. Your contributions are welcomed, but every other editor of Wikipedia reserves the right to edit it mercilessly. This may hurt your ego, but that's how a Wiki works. JFW | T@lk 09:36, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Ok, good compromise, I like what you did with the paper.
Has anyone thought of adding a portion pertaining to the effects of Hirschsprung's disease on an individual if no surgical actions are taken? Like if diet changes solve the problem until the child matures physically to the point where they can have voluntary bowel movements only? Vancar 08:56, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Okay whatever... i was looking at this for a report that i have to do for science trying to get someinfo. i thought it was quite useful! i had no idea a student had written it! so uh, thanks and great job!
How could you come to Wikipedia and NOT know that it's written by everyone? That's the entire point of Wikipedia. Also, you shouldn't use Wikipedia for reports, as you are generally NOT allowed to cite Wikipedia, as it is not a credible source for most professors, as anyone can edit it. ~ Vancar not logged in, at work.
