Talk:History of astrology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of the Astrology WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the astrological content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 |
This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Rg Veda
I removed the entire section on Rg Veda astrology. I have no doubt that there may be (and probably is) some star lore in this early Veda. However, the author from whom the material for this section was drawn, is claiming that comparison of Vishnu to a Lion or as a "Friend of Man" refers to the constellations Leo and Aquarius respectively. If there is to be a section on astrology in the Vedas, it should cover more obvious data such as the system of nakshatras (lunar mansions) used for ritualistic purposes. As a part of the history of science project, this article does not seem to receive much attention from historians of science who have read the relevant material on archeoastronomy. Zeusnoos 14:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was no move. -- tariqabjotu 02:07, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move: History of astrology → History of western astrology
- History of astrology → History of western astrology
- Rationale: The article only covers western astrology, from the Middle East and Europe – 70.55.84.153 15:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
===Votes===Many people believe in horoscopes
- Oppose. Add the Eastern astrology, if needed--FoxyProxy 23:08, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. The history of astrology involves cultural interactions, even to China. Limiting it to 'western' does not allow the bigger picture to emerge and could isolate non-western history forks from editorial attention to such historical interactions. Besides, would we call contributions to astrology from modern Iran and Iraq 'Western'? Zeusnoos 00:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Add Eastern astrology. If it gets too big, maybe we can discuss a separation, but as it stands, Zeusnoos is right, the interactions between East and West are crucial.--TurabianNights 05:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support the article is 38kB long, too long to add Eastern astrology. 132.205.93.88 15:22, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- if needed? Why wouldn't Eastern astrology be needed? That would make this a POV article that excludes other astrology not of the Western tradition, as unimportant and not necessary to the general history of astrology. 132.205.93.88 15:24, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] NPOV
There is virtually no mention of astrology outside of the western tradition (Middle East, Mediterranean, European, and Euro colonists). This cannot be a history of astrology without mention of Vedic and Chinese astrologies at the very least. 132.205.93.19 04:40, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Be bold! I don't think anyone is opposing the addition of other astrological traditions.--TurabianNights 05:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
With the revised article, this is much better, but it also greatly increased the weight of the Western Astrology bit... especially everything about astrology in modern times, proponents and opponents. It now more than ever looks like a history of western astrology article. It's also getting long... so maybe it should be split into a history of western astrology, and then massively shorten western astrology here. (like moving all the 20th century western astrology, proponents and opponents of western astrology off to the history of western astrology section) 132.205.93.89 01:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Combine this page with other like pages
There is already a Western_astrology page and an Astrology_and_astronomy page. Furthermore, to those who say that this page should stand alone because it compares and contrasts the merge of Western and Eastern ideas, please take note that of the following sections in this article: "Chinese Astrology -- This section is a stub. You can help by adding to it. Chinese Astrology & Geomancy. Japanese Astrology & Geomancy. Vedic Astrology -- This section is a stub. You can help by adding to it." This page should really be combined with those other pages that compare and contrast astronomy and astrology and the history of such from a Western viewpoint. Especially as some of the above named pages directly contradict one another. When information is actually obtained showing how, historically, Western and Eastern astrology actually were integrated, rather than merely pointing out historical examples of people like Aleister Crowley who sought to master "everything", then we can begin to debate on whether these pages should actually be seperated. Banaticus 01:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
