Talk:Hurricane Keith

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.
	This article is a current nominee for the Tropical Cyclone Collaboration of the Fortnight.
The following comments have been left for this page: Format the remaining refs correctly, and ship off to FAC. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 06:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC) (edit)

Hurricane Keith has been listed as a good Natsci article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.

	This article is part of WikiProject Central America, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to the Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Todo

More impact. Jdorje 23:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Is it almost a B-class? I will write more tomorrow. íslenska hurikein #12_(samtal) 00:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Not even close. A lot of information is needed in each section. Also, there's no preparations and too few sources. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

I know. But I just got home; I'll add more to it tonight and tomorrow. íslenska hurikein #12_(samtal) 01:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

How's that? I'm sure there's a little more info, but I think it's B-class. íslenska hurikein #12_(samtal) 19:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Too many citations needed, and not enough existing citations. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

There's only 4! That's not that bad, is it? íslenska hurikein #12_(samtal) 02:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

1 is too many unsourced statements for B class. The whole article needs inline sources, simply put. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

There; it's a B-class. Finally! 16:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Um, no. You're not allowed to assess your own articles. The whole article needs inline sources, for starters. There's not enough information in the "Rest of Central America" section. What about damage in Mexico? It made landfall as a category 1 hurricane. Surely there is some info on its second landfall. In the future, please don't assess your own articles. --Hurricanehink (talk) 20:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, that's all I found. I looked some more, but no luck. íslenska hurikein #12 _(samtal) 19:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Looks like Titoxd found tons of info. B-class? íslenskur fellibylur #12 _(samtal) 14:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Yea, sounds good. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

What now? íslenskur fellibylur #12 _(samtal) 20:18, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Cite Web formatting, and pics if possible. Titoxd^(?!?) 21:18, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Photos?

I found good damage photos at http://pso.louisville.edu/capstBeli.html, they are copyrighted...i think. There is a contact list, but I'm too busy to email them. Can someone else do it, or else I'll do it later. They're worthwhile :) íslenska hurikein #12_(samtal) 23:43, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

When you have time, you should ask them. I would, but I personally hate the process of putting pics in articles (though I love seeing pics in articles). --Hurricanehink (talk) 20:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I sent out an e-mail to the secratary. I hope they respond. íslenska hurikein #12 _(samtal) 21:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA Assessment

1. NPOV: Pass but 1 easy problem
2. Broadness: Pass
3. Well-Written: Pass
4. Images: Pass
5. Stability: Pass
6. Factually Accurate: Pass

My only problem: "The name Kirk has yet to be used." That sounds a lot like POV to me. Otherwise, pass.Mitchazenia(7900+edits) 16:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)