User talk:I'm so special

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] David Hicks

Bold is only for the restatement of the article title (or variations, such as his other names, although even those might be debolded) in the header paragraph. Using bold on the statement may actually be seen as an attempt to throw suspicion on the view of the U.S. government. It was stated quite clearly that it is "according to the U.S. government", and that is more than enough to show impartiality. Lexicon (talk) 17:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Maybe, but we're not here to try to push any one point of view. Lexicon (talk) 21:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trolling

I removed tour troling comments from the noticeboard. this looks like an obvious comment from a troll, so best to not continue with this pattern if possible.--MONGO 10:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, sorry I can't reply on your talk as it is protected. I have re-added my comments RE:Guinnog as your justification for their removal is weak at best. I've added a diff to point observers to what you removed - I'm sure that will suffice to show your objections to what I have said. Although I very much doubt that my comments could be called tolling --I'm so special 10:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Please see WP:3RR...thank you very much--MONGO 10:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

You too, and WP:IGNORE - I've brought up our little pointless dispute on the noticeboard. I would advise you that it's highly innapropriate to remove comments that oppose you. Wait for an admin to do so --I'm so special 10:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

This must be a sock account since you seem to know so much about links and other issues...I guess if you can remain unblocked for 3RR I'll have to get a checkuser run on your account...as for all I can tell, you know nothing about me or Guinnog and based on your request to have the aforementioned trolling account unblocked, your entire purpose here appears to be for disruption.--MONGO 10:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ANI

Thank you for your note alerting me to the centralised discussion of my interaction with another user. I appreciate it. --Guinnog 07:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, your block seems to have expired anyway. This edit seems to be the problematic one; personally I would always WP:AGF with (apparently) new users, but I personally am certainly not going to open up the whole thing again! Thanks again, --Guinnog 12:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

I suggest you move on from the affair, as I will attempt to do. Everyone makes mistakes, and sometimes it is good to just forgive others theirs, acknowledge one's own, and keep on going. Best wishes, --Guinnog 12:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)