User talk:I. Thomson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, I. Thomson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Please fill in the Edit summary box when making edits, it is appreciated!
Again, welcome! --duncan 00:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Inverness Retail and Business Park
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from an article. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -sthomson06 (Talk) 16:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kirkcaldy
Please note that Wikipedia is not a directory or an indiscriminate collection of information, many of your edits simply add far far too much information and will be reverted as they have been by myself and others. Fraslet 17:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Can you please please take part in some discussion about your changes to the Kirkcaldy article. Wikipedia is not a directory or an indiscriminate collection of information, many of your edits simply add far far too much information which is unencyclopedic and they are decreasing the quality of the article as a whole. Fraslet 22:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Falkirk
Please note that Wikipedia is not a directory or an indiscriminate collection of information and certainly not intended to provide directions, I see that you have started to add this kind of information to the Falkirk article and would certainly question if this information is necessary or even encyclopedic. Fraslet 17:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] St. John's Shopping Centre
Hi, I'm sorry, but I read your contesting of the deletion of the St. John's Shopping Centre article, but I found the article to lack enough of an assertion of notability to stay as an article. You can read WP:CSD#A7 for the policy on that. Basically, an article must explain why its subject is different from any other shopping center, professor, library, or whatever the article is about. Leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions or want to discuss anything. delldot | talk 01:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, what's up. Got your note. Sorry, I'm really slow on the uptake and I couldn't figure out if you were being sarcastic or not. If not, great, everyone's happy, if you were, you probably want to discuss the deletion more, right? Anyway, if that's the case let me know and we can figure something out. Peace, delldot | talk 02:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Oh, thanks for your kind note! I'm still a brand new admin and I guess I'm afraid of people getting mad at me. So I'm really glad you replied and handled everything so maturely. Anyway, see you around! Let me know if you ever need anything or want to discuss anything! Peace, delldot | talk 15:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Glasgow Fort
An editor has nominated Glasgow Fort, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasgow Fort and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Oh dear! I should have made alterations to my work, before this would occur, i knew this "could" have happened - and it did!
Since this is my work, i will allow the nominator to be free to delete this and it will be accepted flly by me.
Thanks for getting in touch, nevertheless
I. Thomson 22:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- As I mentioned in the AfD discussion, you don't need permission to add information about Glasgow Fort in Easterhouse -- just start writing. (See Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages. It would probably fit in well in the "Amenities" section. As an aside, totally unrelated to this deletion, some of the listed buildings like Provanhall and Blairtummock House would make interesting articles. I like to read articles about historic preservation.) --Elkman (Elkspeak) 14:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
