User talk:Ibaranoff24/Archive03

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

This archive page covers approximately the dates between 10 January 2007 and 22 January 2007.

Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.

Please add new archivals to User talk:Ibaranoff24/Archive04. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. (Ibaranoff24 14:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC))

---

Contents 1 FA nomination for Lord of the Rings (1978 film) 2 Fair use rationale for Image:Bitches brew.jpg 3 Image tagging for Image:This Night I'll Possess Your Corpse.jpg 4 Congratulations! 5 Whoah 6 Successful GA Nomination for Wizards (film) 7 Your GA nomination of Wizards (film) 8 Tenacious D

[edit] FA nomination for Lord of the Rings (1978 film)

Good evening (GMT time); I realise that my comments at the above article's FA nomination and Peer review page have been quite harsh.

Just to let you know, I appreciate everything that you have contributed to the above article, and that you have honoured the encyclopedia with your terrific contributions. However, at Wikipedia we aim for perfection and this may mean we have to pose as pessimists when rating an article :) Please do realise that I do not have anything against you :P If you think I have acted uncivilly or bit you please let me know at my talk page - I'd appreciate any feedback you have for me. If you ever need anything, just drop by my userspace and I'll respond to your comment as soon as I see it. See you around, and keep up the great work!

Regards,
Anthonycfc ^{[T • C]} 20:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bitches brew.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bitches brew.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 23:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 18:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:This Night I'll Possess Your Corpse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:This Night I'll Possess Your Corpse.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:11, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Congratulations!

I just noticed that The Lord of the Rings (1978 film) has been promoted to featured article. Congratulations. I've mentioned it at WikiProject Middle-earth over here. As I said there, would you (or any other film editors - I'm assuming you edit mainly film articles, from looking at your contributions list) be interested in working on any of the film articles in Category:Middle-earth adaptations? Please feel free to reply here or at the WikiProject talk page. Thanks. Carcharoth 23:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

OK. Thanks for the quick reply. Carcharoth 23:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Whoah

Too fast, too fast! There's not enough time for me to find new problems :-D. Anyway, I can't find anything else specific that's a problem. It perhaps could do with a little more expansion, if there's any information left in sources but aside from that, looks good. Trebor 23:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Successful GA Nomination for Wizards (film)

[edit] Your GA nomination of Wizards (film)

The article Wizards (film) you nominated as a good article has passed , see Talk:Wizards (film) for eventual comments about the article. Good luck in future nominations.. I would appreciate it if you'd take a look at The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, for GA although please don't feel obliged to. BigHairRef | Talk 02:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

The uncited source you mentioned in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess has been removed DurinsBane87 10:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look at the GA nomination. I came to say I've changed it (notes on the talk page if you're interested), but it seems that someone beat me to it. If you're after someone to look at an article in the future I'll be hapy to help. Thanks again! BigHairRef | Talk 12:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tenacious D

Is it okay if I remove the article from Category:Articles with unsourced statements now. I have lead a citing drive and did not think the article has unsourced statements.

I would put this article back up for nomination if you felt I had covered all the unsourced statements.

Please get back to me.

Tenacious D Fans (talk) 14:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Please point them out. I will cite them if you do this. Thanks. Tenacious D Fans (talk) 14:53, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

That's true. I think there is some POV, so it needs removed. Any more? Tenacious D Fans (talk) 14:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

I'll delete the categories (they are unnecessary just now). Can I renominate this? Tenacious D Fans (talk) 15:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I removed the categories. Tenacious D Fans (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Should I remove the notice that the page failed the good article nomination? Tenacious D Fans (talk) 15:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. I have dealt with it now and renominated. I decided to remove the failed to pass good article status notice. Thanks again. Tenacious D Fans (talk) 15:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)