Talk:IMADEC University
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Deletions by anonymous user
Maybe the user with IP 81.223.156.232 would like to explain why he/she keeps deleting parts of the article without comment? They seem relevant and NPOV, and they're sourced. See [1]. I don't want to get into an edit war here, maybe there's a good reason for the deletions, but it's just not apparent to me. --Brindt 08:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
IP 81.223.156.232 belongs to (name removed by Brindt, please see comment below) [2]. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.108.188.113 (talk)
- Whoever it is, he has struck again. This is really getting vandalistic. Maybe someone with more WP experience could suggest how to deal with this situation? Brindt 11:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Talk page blanked by same IP again. Restored it, placed a notice on the IP's user page. Brindt 06:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Talk page blanked by same IP again. Restored by: --Wikiwatchers 15:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] FIBAA accredited or not?
Re accreditation, current article version reads "The Executive MBA program is accredited by the Foundation for International Business Administration (FIBAA)." The list of accredited universities at http://www.fibaa.de/engl/austria.htm doesn't say a word about this Imadec University though. 85.125.224.28 21:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- Be bold! 200.208.159.132 17:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mediation Query
I would like to offer my services as an unofficial mediator. Feel free to contact me on my talk page.
For the purposes of mediation, I am requesting that all parties refrain from editing, erasing or altering anything on this talk page. Additions are fine, but it is hard to come to a resolution of anything without a record of what has gone on.
To start with, what facts can we all agree on? Bobzchemist 22:42, 16 February 2007 (UTC) (TINMC)
- It appears that the user with IP 81.223.156.232 has stopped messing with the article, but is still unhappy that WHOIS information about his IP's ownership is shown above. I'm taking the liberty of editing out the name from 80.108.188.113's comment, but I'm leaving the link in – it's public and easily retrievable information after all, not a secret. Hopefully this will stop the deletion-and-revert cycle. --Brindt 09:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
