Institutional dichotomy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In his essay, The Gap — The Bridge, John Wolfenden, responsible for the Wolfenden Report, states that the dichotomization of intellectual disciplines by educational institutions, specifically collegiate institutions, is to blame for the communication gap between specialists in different fields.
Forced to pursue contrasting disciplines in college, students diverge from the broad educational background established in high school and pursue narrower studies. As a result, these students lose contact with the shared basis of their education as they venture into separate abstract studies. In effect, the communication gap of collegiate students widens as they become saturated with a curriculum of abstractions that relate to a single area of study.
For instance, a college freshman chooses mathematics as his field of study while another chooses English. As they study, the two students become grossly out of touch as they adapt to new languages which will soon serve as a code in their future careers. The mathematics student becomes consumed by symbols and numbers while the English student immerses himself in a sea of classical literary styles and grammatical mechanics. Consequently, the students soon become ill-equipped to communicate with each other. The mathematics student now becomes "illiterate" by standards of the English major and the English major becomes "innumerate" by standards of the mathematics major.
Because knowledge is increasing, some fragmentation of disciplines is inevitable. The problem with fragmentation is that students are forced to live in ignorance of studies outside of their fields.
[edit] Analogy of institutional dichotomy
Many believe it would only be prudent to create a bridge between contrasting studies because doing so would prevent intellectual chaos which, in effect, could disrupt humanity's quest for universal knowledge. Chauncey L. Covington, one opponent of institutional dichotomy, likens the formation of institutional dichotomy with ancient African tribes. Due to the scarceness of vegetation and meat centuries ago, tribes that were once united were forced to disperse in search of food. The more they spread out, the more culturally fragmented they became. As a result, this simple behaviour eventually spawned hundreds of distinctive languages and cultures among people who were once the same. Sadly, when these tribes later meet by chance, they find unfamiliar cultures, resulting in cultural chaos. Many believe that the consequence of scientific/linguistic fragmentation might be intellectual, but not cultural, chaos.
[edit] See also
The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution by C. P. Snow, 1959
