Talk:Isaac Morley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This article is part of Latter Day Saint movement WikiProject, an attempt to provide comprehensive and detailed information about the Latter Day Saint movement and Mormonism on Wikipedia. To participate in the project, edit this article, visit the List of articles about Mormonism, the project page, and/or join the discussion. For writing guidelines about contributing to the project, you may want to read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Latter Day Saints) and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Latter Day Saints) | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
I disagree with removing the stake president succession box mainly because at the time this office was the de facto leader in the area, which may be notable. HOWEVER, I don't believe Morley was ever officially a stake president, so if a box is kept it ought to be modified. I don't think it was a "stake" when he was the leader out there, it was some kind of mega branch. I think there may be three or four significant people that may warrant whatever succession box might come out of this. These were the de facto leaders (in succession) over the area through about the 1880s. I can't remember all their names, but it's at least got to be Morley, Welcome Chapman, and Canute Peterson. I'm pretty sure there's someone between Peterson and Chapman. Any thoughts? --TrustTruth 17:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
