Talk:Isabel Inlet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North Carolina, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve North Carolina-related articles to a feature-quality standard. |
[edit] This must be the worst talk page ever
Weak keep separate. Who proposed that the two articles be merged? Why should they be? Why shouldn't they be? I, the creator of this page about 8 months ago, was hoping to form an "Outer Banks" series, covering all the inlets and islands of the Outer Banks. Nowhere on wikipedia was there a tutorial on how to go about forming such a series, so I gave up. Here's one of the articles I was trying to make, but the series will never be complete until wikipedia updates their dinosaur of an editing system. Sorry to complain here, but I have nowhere else to turn and I want people to know the intention with which this article was made. 164.107.92.130 19:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yea, I think the inlet is deserving of its own article for the purpose of compiling inlets in the state and for category reasons. The problem is that both articles cover the same information. If this article is going to stay, it needs to include more unique information. The Effects of the hurricane article should just cover how the inlet was formed while this article can focus more on how it was repaired and how future erosion was (hopefully) prevented. --TinMan 22:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
